Historically, what does it mean when a society attacks masculinity?
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 11 months ago by
.
The claim here , via historical references, is that when a society “progresses” to the point of emasculating men or even just general androgyny it is about to fall as has happened a number of times in the past.
I don’t doubt that there is something wrong about this “demasculining” of men. On the other hand, I’d be just as wary of the “strong man”, especially when such a man is the ruler or has some position of power.
I suspect a lot of this is simply some kind of an attempt by man to play God, to try to create reality in his own image. God made humans male and female? Then we will redefine ourselves, we will be the masters of ourselves, or our own fate. We will say what we are.
The feminizing of men, the masculizing of women, the sexualizing of children, the promotion of propaganda as truth despite all factual evidence to the contrary, the promotion of the trivial to a place of great importance, how society is amusing itself to death, how churches are amusing themselves to Hell, how something that nobody cared about five minutes ago is suddenly all-important at this moment. I think the Bible is again shown to be true when it says about the last days, “Evil men will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived”, and about mankind in general, “Men love darkness rather than light, because their works are evil”.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
