Today, Ubisoft released a trailer for Assassins Creed Shadows, the next game in the seventeen-year-old video game franchise. But instead of getting gamers excited, it got them laughing at the latest ridiculous instance of forced diversity, which involves a big historical reach. Then, it stopped being funny when Wikipedia tried to alter history to support the game. You can see the trailer below:
I imagine something stuck out to you about one of the two heroes of a game set in Japan in the late 1500s and steeped in Japanese culture – specifically that he’s a black guy. This character is actually based on a real person named Yasuke, a black man who lived in Japan for three years and got that name from the daimyō Oda Nobunaga. However, it seems odd to make a game about Japanese culture and then choose someone who isn’t Japanese and only lived in the country for a short time as one of the two main characters, which people are noticing:
ASSASSIN’s CREED SHADOWS key art leaked, yep it’s confirmed alright. Yasuke the black samurai is one of the main characters.
The other is a shinobi woman named Naoe, trailer comes tomorrow. But it’s confirmed now for sure, the first AAA AC game set in Japan walked right past… pic.twitter.com/Zw6nHKyh42
— Endymion (@EndymionYT) May 14, 2024
But it gets weirder. Apparently, Yasuke was not a samurai, or at least probably wasn’t:
Assassin’s Creed being based in Japan and then NOT using a Japanese male protagonist is stupid. We know exactly why they’re using Yasuke (THE MESSAGE) and it’s annoying. It would be as dumb as having it based in Africa and deciding to use a white male protagonist. pic.twitter.com/nn9oK4RwKS
— Kaida 🌊 (@khaliltooshort) May 14, 2024
Assassin's Creed Shadows character, Yasuke, was never a samurai. pic.twitter.com/6tn0sFTRQT
— Grummz (@Grummz) May 15, 2024
Mark Kern, the former Blizzard producer and current nemesis of DEI in gaming who goes by Grummz on social media, sums up the optics of and likely motivation behind making Yasuke the focus of Assassin’s Creed Shadows:
Ubisoft
– Tries to be woke
– Picks Yasuke, a black man who was treated like a novelty item in a racist way by Nobunaga and never did anything of note except surrender.
– Names the game Assassins Creed Shadows, invoking racist overtones.
Who's the racist? pic.twitter.com/Faljj6abOn
— Grummz (@Grummz) May 15, 2024
It’s obvious this is what Ubisoft is doing, isn’t it? There were so many samurai they could have used, but they chose someone who wasn’t Japanese and likely wasn’t a samurai, and the other main character is a woman. And some Wikipedia editor seems to know this because they’re now trying to edit the Wikipedia article on Yasuke to eliminate the sentence that says he was probably never a samurai and when called on it, says he doesn’t need a source to back up his edits:
Wikipedia is wavering a war at this moment changing the story of Yazuke so it can be suitable for modern audiences.
This is a prime example of how video games are used as cultural weapons to erase the truth behind history. A slap in the face to the Japanese people and historians pic.twitter.com/YkbayUFHSs
— LearningTheLaw (@Mangalawyer) May 15, 2024
User Theozilla has successfully removed the section from Wikipedia detailing the lack of proof of Yasuke being a samurai. Editors argue that this action represents another form of revisionism in favor of big corporations. He claims no source is needed to identify him as a Samurai pic.twitter.com/CxgCDE6rWW
— LearningTheLaw (@Mangalawyer) May 15, 2024
This is insane. What Ubisoft should have done – other than making a video game about historical Japan and the samurai with Japanese people as the main characters – is say they’re taking creative license and using a historical figure to craft a cool video game character in a historical fiction narrative. I mean, JFK and Richard Nixon didn’t really team up with Fidel Castro and Robert McNamara to fight a zombie invasion of the White House, but nobody tried to rewrite history so people would believe Call of Duty: Black Ops – Zombies really happened. The problem is that they know everyone else understands that they’re doing this for the wrong reasons, so they’re trying to cover their tracks (or have others cover their tracks) so they can turn it around on their detractors.
Among their detractors are Japanese people, many of whom don’t seem thrilled that their culture is being used to push Western wokeness:
Let's see how well-received the latest stunning and brave Assassin's Creed Shadows is in Japan. I'm sure things are going to be fin… omg 🫨 😆 pic.twitter.com/bJVZziuKxw
— LearningTheLaw (@Mangalawyer) May 15, 2024
Japanese Reception from Ubisoft's latest videogame, Assassin's Creed Shadows.
One Japanese user says: "For the first time I understood what cultural Appropriation was"
Very diverse neo-colonialist we have here 💀 pic.twitter.com/SDnyudjuup
— LearningTheLaw (@Mangalawyer) May 16, 2024
Can’t imagine why they’re so insulted. Maybe some games journalists will get together and call them all racists.
Making this even more damning is the possibility that the final version of Assassins Creed Shadows was changed from earlier concepts that featured Japanese characters:
I worked on some narrative elements for the Sengoku Era of Japan for Assassin’s Creed back in 2013-2014 when I worked under contract in San Jose/Tokyo (Aeria). I guess they tossed all that out for Black Samurai and some canon-destroying Kunoichi-boss?
I’m so glad I’m not in that… pic.twitter.com/El0dXRiBQO
— Infinitale: Chronicles #1 | For Sale on Amazon! (@InfinitaleComic) May 15, 2024
However, Grummz has also heard from sources that this may not be true, or at least not completely:
I have other sources that I trust that are telling me that the story might be unchanged, after all.
I can't go into specifics, but this original poster might not have had the full story.
Long had short of it, AC Shadows has had a long development and it has gone through many… https://t.co/T0gmP3IbpC
— Grummz (@Grummz) May 15, 2024
I think it was also true. But that was a long time ago and many team members ago. Was it changed to be DEI? No, not according to my sources.
Will it end up DEI with bad writing? This is still possible as its gone through many hands. https://t.co/cfLA3kT5sm
— Grummz (@Grummz) May 15, 2024
All we’ve got is a trailer for this game, and it’s already steeped in controversy. I suspect this won’t be a big hit, despite being an Assassins Creed game and following a successful entry in the series. Another week, another woke gaming controversy, and we prepare for the wheel to turn again.
It turns out they did something very similar with the other lead character: https://www.geeksandgamers.com/naoe-the-female-lead-of-assassins-creed-shadows-is-a-stand-in-as-well/
This beloved setting and time period could have been such a gold-mine.
But NO! It’s Ubishit after all. They absolutely HAVE to revise history and force feed DEI propaganda no matter the cost.
Also don’t forget: The lead writer of AssCreed Shadows, Alissa, follows SBI on her Twitter page and has pronouns in her bio.
This is all the proof you need to see how DEI infested this game company is.