Geeks + Gamers › Forums › Community Hub › Current Events › A new Texas law forces vendors to rate sexual content in schoolbooks
A new Texas law forces vendors to rate sexual content in schoolbooks. They’re not happy about it
Book vendors selling to Texas public schools, ranging from national sellers like Amazon to local bookstores with eight employees, must now rate all the books they sell based on sexual content, according to new legislation signed into law June 12.
Vendors?
The law’s primary author, Republican Texas State Rep. Jared Patterson, said its aim is simple: Get sexually explicit content out of schools.
I agree with the “Get sexually explicit content out of schools”.
But the burden of rating these books falls on book vendors.
Should the publishers not be responsible for the rating, and not the vendors?
Under the ‘Restricting Explicit and Adult-Designated Educational Resources’ Act, or the READER Act, vendors that sell books to Texas public schools must assign every title that describes or portrays sexual conduct one of two labels: sexually explicit or sexually relevant.
But I think the books/novels/trades/magazines/etc should all come with a ratings on it, just like movies are rated for sexual content. This should be at the publisher’s level.
Just like they list books that are for young children, children, young adult, adult/exotic, they can easily add those two labels.
But not the vendor.
“They’ve encapsulated the whole entire industry,” (Ben Conn, President of the Educational Book and Media Association) said. “That would be like to say Paramount’s going to come out with a movie and every individual movie theater could then go ahead and rate the movie differently. It just makes no sense whatsoever.”
That is why a national body (like the MPA does for movies) but for books/novels/etc?
I have always been very much against the idea of passing additional laws because current laws are ineffective as they are not or are selectively enforced.
In fact I consider passing such laws political grandstanding because they know what the root cause is but they are just looking to score political points.
Just enforce what’s there.
Just enforce what’s there.
Sadly, I have seen where schools, school boards, teachers, etc use the law of “for educational purposes” to skirt around “sexually explicit content”.
Well that’s my entire point. If you have people whom are well aware of the law and intentionally circumvent it, I am not sure how more laws will help. In my mind lack of enforcement is the issue not the lack of laws.
In Waterstones (a book shop in the UK) there is a section for children/Young Adult books. The rest of the shop is usually filled with over genres such as fiction, sci-fi, romance and fantasy. Oh and manga and graphic novels. Not sure why schools don’t do this as well but have a area for books for teenagers/late teens only.
In American schools I think that would be unneeded because the ages of kids are not very mixed in our schools. Typically in public schools you only have a small age range in the same school. Obviously there are exceptions but this is what I have always seen.
In Canada, we have:
We also have Elementary/Junior High Schools (grades 1-9).
Some Elementary Schools also have kindergarden/ECS (Early Childhood Services) for ages (for 5 years olds).
So the shared school’s library (for elementary/junior high schools) needs to have books suitable for ages 5-14.
I can easily see then need for “appropriate content”.
And as we have seen where the publishers have pushed “inappropriate” math/science text books with racist/sexist/etc questions and situations, something NEEDS to be done.
They way things are being done now is not enough to “protect our children”.
Over here we have:
Playgroup (playschool)- 0-5 years old
Infants/Primary School- Year 1- Year 6 (from 5 years old till 11 years old)
Secondary School- Year 7- Year 12 (11- 16 years old)
Sixthform (usually optional but you need to have good grades either way to get in (16- 19 years old)
I hope I’ve got some of those right🤣