Canada is getting real comfortable with killing its disabled

Young woman who survived Brussels terror attack ‘euthanised’ after suffering severe PTSD

A young woman who survived the 2016 terror attack in Brussels airport has died after choosing to be euthanised due to suffering extreme depression and PTSD following the incident.

Euthanized?  Suicide?  Assisted Suicide?  Murdered?

Despite escaping the blast and leaving the scene physically unharmed, the psychological effects of the attack sent her spiralling into a deep depression and left her suffering from intense panic attacks from which she never managed to recover from.

Shanti later attended a psychiatric hospital in her hometown of Antwerp and took a range of antidepressant medications, but was unable to make a full recovery and attempted suicide on two seperate occasions in 2018 and 2020.

And what did the doctors do?

 ‘I get a few medications for breakfast. And up to 11 antidepressants a day. I couldn’t live without it.

‘With all the medications I take, I feel like a ghost that can’t feel anything anymore. Maybe there were other solutions than medications.’

Drugs, drugs, drugs.

Euthanasia, defined as the practice of intentionally ending a person’s life to relieve pain and suffering, is legal in Belgium for an individual who is in ‘a medically futile condition of constant and unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated, resulting from a serious and incurable disorder caused by illness or accident’.

And I am sure that they will expand who all qualifies to be killed as time goes on.  Life has no meaning/value if it cannot be exploited by some, and when they are no longer useful, they are erased.

And it gets worse!

Federal minister says she’s ‘shocked’ by suggestion of assisted deaths for some babies

Canada’s minister of disability inclusion says she’s offended by a Quebec doctor’s suggestion that infants less than a year old should have access to medically assisted deaths if they are unlikely to survive and are dealing with severe health issues.

Infanticide!

Dr. Louis Roy, of Quebec’s College of Physicians, said his group believes assisted death could be offered to babies up to one year old “with severe deformities and very serious syndromes for which the chances of survival are virtually nil, and which will cause so much pain that a decision must be made to not allow the child to suffer.”

And who is to say what that “suffering” is?

Qualtrough, who is legally blind, said that while she can’t speak on behalf of the entire government, “there is no world where I would accept that.”

People often make incorrect assumptions about the quality of life that someone with a disability experiences, she said.

Yay, and people like Dr.Louis Roy is IMO more a Eugenicist.

Qualtrough also said she hears frequently that some people with disabilities are seeking assisted deaths because they can’t find adequate housing or sufficient care.

“Working with the disability community and hearing very regularly that people’s options around MAID are being driven by lack of social supports is devastating,” she said.

So according to that doctor, kill the disabled to save on future social commitments by the government.

Canadians who weren’t already nearing death became eligible for MAID in 2021, when the government changed the law in response to a lower court ruling. That change allows people with “grievous and irremediable” medical conditions who are experiencing “intolerable suffering” to seek a doctor’s help to die — even if their natural deaths are decades away.

And how is a one year old infant to decide that?  They can’t!

IMO, it is more that this “doctor” wants to give parents a away out of taking care of a disabled child of these… by KILLING IT!

Before the law changed, the federal government was warned by many disability advocates of the risk of disabled people seeking assisted deaths because inadequate supports left them feeling they had no other options.

And that is now happening.

“I’m very concerned about the messages that people are getting from this, that somehow a life lived with disability is is worse than death,” she said.

Not to a Eugenicist.  They are nothing but a mass of tissues to be tossed away.

The cult of death is taking it one step further.

Canadian doctors encouraged to bring up medically assisted death before their patients do

In most jurisdictions in the world with legalized euthanasia, doctors are explicitly prohibited, or strongly discouraged from raising assisted dying with a patient.

The request must come from the person.

But a guidance document produced by Canada’s providers of medically assisted death states that doctors have a professional obligation to bring up MAID as an option, when it’s “medically relevant” and the person is likely eligible, as part of the informed consent process.

ie. the people killing people want more people to kill, sooner rather than later.

But some ethicists argue that introducing death as a “treatment option,” without the person suggesting it first, is seriously problematic, especially within the expanding realm of MAID, and that people could be unduly influenced to choose to have their life intentionally ended, given the power dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship.

ie. I am tried of treating you, you are going to die eventually, so why not die now!

“Some people, no matter how well-handled your conversation, may infer that it’s essentially a suggestion,” said University of Toronto bioethicist Kerry Bowman.

“They would also definitely infer that they have the strong potential to meet eligibility criteria, or you wouldn’t be offering it.”

Or the kickback from sending one to their death outweighs any financial benefit of keeping them coming to your office/keeping them alive.

“We have to make sure that people are aware of their options,” (CAMAP’s vice president, Dr. Konia) Trouton said. “Awareness is not the same as coercing them or pushing them in that direction.”

MAID would never be raised solely, in and of itself, she said, but within the context of discussing “goals of care” and “values clarifications.”

ie. value to the financial bottom line to the physician?  value/cost to the patient to their bank accounts to keep them alive?  etc.

“’Do you want to move to a nursing home? Do you want to be resuscitated? Do you want CPR? Do you want to be in the intensive care unit?’ And within that, ‘Is assistance to die something that is ethically abhorrent to you or acceptable to you? Is that something you want to explore more, or not?’”

Which comes down to, do you want to die naturally or killed?  And if you had a competent doctor whom you have been visiting, they should already have a great deal of knowledge about that the patient thinks.

Not raising MAID could mean to deny people’s rights, Bowman said, “because there are people out there that think, ‘If I was eligible, (the doctor) would have brought it up.’” Those living in isolated areas, or people new to Canada, may not know assisted death is legal in this country, he said.

ie. they want more people to know they can be “legally killed”, so let us help you kill yourself!

Many people in health care are risk avoidant, he said. “Knowing that someone could interpret their conversation as encouraging suicidality is enough to stop a lot of people from even bringing it up. Because that is clearly illegal.”

I consider any form of killing as murder, be it via suicide, abortion, assisted killing, assassinations, etc.

“I also see it as very problematic when we bring (MAID) up to people who can’t pay the rent, or people who are living with disability who don’t have adequate access to the things that they need,” Bowman said.

Within the mental illness context, “imagine what this means,” said Trudo Lemmens, a professor of health law and policy at the University of Toronto.

“You have a person who is severely depressed where the nature of the illness is often accompanied by a desire to die. The person takes a step to go and see a mental health counsellor to get help, and is being told, as part of the informed consent procedure, we can have treatment a, b, c or MAID.”

The most vulnerable in society, a solution is deletion.  A form of eugenics, IMO.

This is sickening.