House of the Dragon Ep-4 review.

Geeks + Gamers Forums Entertainment Television House of the Dragon Ep-4 review.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #281089
    Mustangride1
    Moderator

      I am going to start out with my score 7.5

      This episode actually moved the plot along, had political intrigue that was believable and consequences.

      Lets get the Cringe out of the way. People they are Targaryen’s and it was no shock to anyone who knows the story of them from books or the original Game of Thrones, they Marry and Have incestuous sex. So, stop being fake shocked.

      Also Spoiled, she Marries her uncle aka Matt Smith better known as Daemon. It is the Targaryen thing to do after-all. Now the Brothel scene was not that great. The Orgy in Conan was better and really the one in Rome is even better than that.

      Ok now that the “GASP” omg moment out of the way, Lets dive in to Daemon giving up the crown, yes its in the books. But how he did it is different. But nonetheless is what they did and wasn’t done bad.

      Next is the aftermath of The Princess’s night out. The lines were good between the Queen and Princess, but there is absolutely NO onscreen chemistry between them. The actress who plays the queen just has no presence on screen at all. She is as dead a presence than she was a lay in that scene.

      It hurt that scene tremendously, they could not play off each other. Rhaenyra Plays well off other characters, but not off the Queen. Again, the dialogue was good, but Alicent’s actress is just there filling a dead space.

      When the King confronts Daemon, it was and OK scene Paddy really has me enjoying him in interactions with Daemon and even with Rhaenyra. I had to chuckle a hung-over Daemon still more believable than Otto or Alicent. The problem with this is I do know the story and both of them should be much more cunning and believable. I just do not buy their performances. Could it be the directors?

      The King talking to Rhaenyra… Bunch of BULLSHIT, again the first mention of the prince that was promised was Rhaegar in Danys dream in the House of the Undying. Now we do know the Prophecy is much older possibly 5,000 years old, and originated in Asshai. Many cultures have a story such as that in our own world. But not sure why they would put it in this series because it bears no relevance on it. It is a “member-berry” and does nothing for this series.

      Lastly the King and Otto scene, again Paddy does a great job delivering his lines. Otto is like his daughter “a dead lay” no emotions none at all.

      All-in-all, I enjoyed this episode, it moved the plot along and did not have any wasted scenes, I wish we had better directors as that might help with the actor’s chemistry, maybe not, maybe we needed both. Luckily or Unluckily, we will be getting 2 new actress’s soon to play Alicent and Rhaenyra, maybe they can have chemistry, or better yet, Let the Civil War start and not need to see them interact.

      #281098

      Just watched Odin’s review and being a devout Catholic he was understandably perturbed by the sex scenes. It’s not that he had a problem with the story or the historical context of the portrayal but rather the explicit sexualization of children/teenagers on screen crossed a line.

      Could they have found a less titillating way to convey the message? Probably, but where’s the fun in that?

       

       

      #281112
      Mustangride1
      Moderator

        @Maverick, havent seen his, I do not watch other reviews before giving mine. I was is a watch party for this last night and gave it the same rating after the show and same arguments.  This episode was good enough I already knew my review as it ended.

        Anyone watching this, and knows anything about GOT and that universe, knows these scenes will happen. I heard it from people in e-mail this morning and why I specifically addressed it. Could they have implied? Sure, but this is HBO and they have never been shy about it, and certainly not in ASOIAF world. No lines crossed to me, that were not already established in GOT.

        Dany was 13 when she married Drogo.
        Sansa would be 15 or 16 at the Ramsey marriage
        Arya would be 15 or 16 at the Battle for Winterfel
        Margeery would have been about 17 when she married Tommen
        Tommen would have been at most 12 or 13.

        Right now Rhaenera is 13 or 14 in the show as we still have not the 5th year anniversary party for the King and Queen which we know was in 111ac. Just pointing facts out for clarity.

        #281217

        I’m enjoying the show so far. All the episodes were very good, imo.

        But I’m concerned about the acting after the time jump… we’ll see…. if it keeps the same quality, I’ll be the first one to show my respect and praise.

        But oh well… the non-binary is coming. :x lol  princess they/them

        #281230

        I have enjoyed the show so far. I like the guy playing the king, he does an excellent job. The guy playing the uncle as well, he always seems off in the head, untrustworthy as well. The girl playing the princess is beautiful and plays the part good.

        #283741

        I just want to say that the actress who plays the “old” Rhaenyra is actually good and the show kept its quality. I had no reason to be concerned. ;)

        Great show and great acting.

      Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

      Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

      SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

      NAVIGATION