Lockdowns, Masks, and Vaccines Have All Been Complete Failures…

Geeks + Gamers Forums Community Hub Current Events Lockdowns, Masks, and Vaccines Have All Been Complete Failures…

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #255283

    Heard off the grapevine that apparently Klaus Schwab and his cronies at the WEF have been lately receiving death threats over the lockdowns and mandates; people basically figured out it was the guys at the very top of society for why their businesses went under, their children traumatized and now being threatened to lose everything else by having the right to bodily autonomy removed from them. All with no end in sight. You can hardly expect them to be reasonable.

    It’s probably why the WEF didn’t have their little get-together every January like they normally do and why some countries have been easing off on COVID restrictions: Most of these politicians pushed too hard and too fast and the WEF likely told them to back off lest people got violent.

    #255284

    Klaus Schwab basically admitting politicians are groomed to represent their interests instead of ours.

    #256112

    Scientists criticize flaws in study that found lockdowns do little to reduce COVID deaths

    …a Johns Hopkins University study showing that lockdowns only curbed COVID deaths by 0.2 per cent…

    ONLY 0.2% ! ! !

    And almost immediately, this study gets attacked.

    “Smoking causes cancer, the earth is round, and ordering people to stay at home … decreases disease transmission. A study purporting to prove the opposite is almost certain to be fundamentally flawed,” reads a critique by the University of Oxford’s Seth Flaxman…

    Well at one time it was science FACT that the Earth was FLAT, and anyone who stated otherwise was fundamentally flawed, persecuted and excommunicated.

    Science Method!

    The_Scientific_Method.svg

    But now, science has gone back to the days where science = politics/agenda.

    The Johns Hopkins paper in question is a pre-print meta-analysis of 34 prior studies examining the link between lockdowns and COVID mortality. Its authors ultimately conclude that lockdowns have “little to no public health effects” and should be “rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument.”

    Looking at Kommifornia and Florida, New York and Texas, places with lockdowns and those without.

    Looking at FACTS and DATA!

    But since this report does not follow the political “AGENDA”, it will be attacked… science be DAMNED!

     

    #256128

    “Smoking causes cancer, the earth is round, and ordering people to stay at home … decreases disease transmission. A study purporting to prove the opposite is almost certain to be fundamentally flawed,” reads a critique by the University of Oxford’s Seth Flaxman…

    Yeah. This study is certain t0 be fundamentally flawed because it didn’t come to the conclusion we wanted. Notice how they don’t say HOW it’s fundamentally flawed though

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

NAVIGATION