SJWs: “Star Wars is for kids” – Also SJWs: “Let’s talk about s*x in SWTHR”

Tagged: #starwars, SJWs, TheHighRepublic

This topic has 15 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 10 months ago by SentinelJedi257.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

Author
Posts
March 17, 2021 at 11:29 am #213063
DigiCat
Moderator
What the fuck!?!
Also…
In Into the Dark, Affie Hollow is stated to be seventeen years old, meaning she was born in 249 BBY.
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Affie_Hollow
This book has a 17 year old (minor) talking about sex with a grown man, and of course SJWs think it’s ok, sickening
March 17, 2021 at 12:31 pm #213066
Legatus_Legionis
Those SJW’s are pedo’s.
The younger they can get children thinking and talking about sex, the earlier they can make it OK to then have sex with them.
March 17, 2021 at 3:25 pm #213079
SuperSoynic_Speed
The age of consent is 16 in most of the world, so it’s not necessary pedo stuff. And I mean if it’s only talking then is there a real problem then? Is sex education a problem?
- This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by SuperSoynic_Speed.
March 17, 2021 at 3:58 pm #213086
TowLiquor
Dude, Soy man. Are you making excuses to protect people who want to bang children who cant even buy a pack of smokes yet?
March 17, 2021 at 4:24 pm #213090
DigiCat
Moderator
@SuperSoynic_Speed, whatever the age of consent is, I’m pretty sure we can all agree that a grown up wanting to do it with a 16/17 year old is creepy (to put it mildly)
Sex education isn’t a problem, but, 1) the way this book is written doesn’t come off as sex ed, least imo, and 2, my point was that this is considered ok for a Star Wars book by SJWs, and those same SJWs say that Star Wars is for kids, not teens (we all know what happens when we become teenagers), kids, so these SJWs are basically saying it’s ok to let kids read books or watch shows witch talk about sex, that’s fucked up
March 17, 2021 at 4:29 pm #213091
Legatus_Legionis
Age of consent, and the age difference between the teen and the other IS the problem.
It is called “sexual exploitation”, “sexual interference”, “child pornography”, etc.
Any time you push “SEX” onto a younger and younger demographics, this is what you are aiming for.
The character might be 17, but the target audience this garbage is targeting is WAY younger than that.
March 17, 2021 at 5:14 pm #213094
Hargrave
theres a reason 16 pedos and a huge pedo ring were caught at disney recently just saying
March 17, 2021 at 5:19 pm #213095
DarthGregious
Legatus is right. In the video, Anna shows the target age group for this book is around 12-18. Way too young for anything like this, especially when looking at the age gap between them. Not only is it weird, but it’s normalizing that for the children reading. That’s the problem. And I don’t think that using the age of consent around the world is a fair excuse here. This isn’t from somewhere else like the Star Wars books solely written for the Chinese market. This was written by an American author for American children to read.
March 17, 2021 at 8:36 pm #213120
FallenOmegaStar
I would say sixteen is an age of reasonable consent because sometimes life can find a way in unexpected situations, but it’s definitely pretty creepy for a grown adult to actively pursue a teenager (that said I’m not entirely fond of sex ed either because I see it as encouraging sex out of wedlock. Call me old fashioned, but that invites all kinds of social problems).
And as others have said, it’s not really the issue here. It’s putting the topic in some place where it’s not appropriate and potentially introducing kids to concepts they’re not old enough to really comprehend, yet.
Leftists in particular have a pretty bizarre obsession with sex, and part of their activism revolves around pushing their perverse fetishes as a “right” just to behave in a vulgar manner in public without judgment. They in turn have this equally bizarre obsession of obtaining the approval of children and often these two cases will overlap, which have included bringing children to gay pride marches. Complete with male genitalia on full display.
I am referring to extreme examples of course and by comparison this by itself is relatively benign. At best this is a somewhat garish way of writing. Any professional writer could’ve been a lot more subtle in a way that only adult readers would’ve gotten, so this just only shows how low LucasBooks have fallen in getting complete hacks to write novels now (honestly, the excerpt itself looks like something you’d find on Fanfiction.net).
March 18, 2021 at 11:16 am #213363
MrDragonbane
Sexual interaction has no business being in Star Wars.
Most of the couples involved in the EU books eventually get married and raise a family. That is all that is needed for a book.
March 18, 2021 at 12:32 pm #213386
SuperSoynic_Speed
Idk how old the grown man is, could be 22 or 23 for all that I know. But yes, a 17 year old having a sexual relationship with a grown man is creepy and morally wrong, but it’s not illegal. And it definitely isn’t pedophilia, and I see quite a lot of pedo things thrown around here. Pedos should get their dicks cut of for all that I care, just don’t use the term when it does not apply.
March 18, 2021 at 1:29 pm #213394
TowLiquor
That is a sound point, Triple S, I’ll give you that. But that doesnt change the fact that sex was injected into literature aimed at young teenagers when it isnt pertinent to the story at all. Nor necessary.
March 18, 2021 at 1:37 pm #213395
DigiCat
Moderator
1) The grown man is not 22/23, the author specifically said there’s quite a big age gap between the 2 in an interview
2) 22/23 with a 17 year old is starting to get creepy, 18/20 I can kinda get, that’s a small enough age gap that they could’ve been school mates in high school, obviously the older one’s gonna become an adult first
3) If this
But yes, a 17 year old having a sexual relationship with a grown man is creepy and morally wrong
is morally wrong, then it should be illegal
- This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by DigiCat.
March 19, 2021 at 4:38 am #213583
SuperSoynic_Speed
@TowLiquor idk how bad it was but I don’t think all sexual references whatsoever should be banned for shows aimed at people under 18. If it was unnecessary and morally wrong then yeah, it would’ve been better to not include it.
is morally wrong, then it should be illegal

@DigiCat that’s a slippery slope you don’t wanna take. If every morally wrong action was illegal, we would all be in jail at this point.
- This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by SuperSoynic_Speed.
March 19, 2021 at 6:39 am #213597
DigiCat
Moderator
Ok @SuperSoynic_Speed, let me be more specific
If you do something morally wrong, and you’re the only person to be affected by this action, by all means live your life
But, if the morally wrong action hurts someone innocent (and I don’t mean hurting SJWs feefees 😭) then the law should protect the innocent person
Author
Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.