The point at which an abortionist realized he was wrong
- This topic has 33 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 11 months, 1 week ago by
.
I know this is a hot topic. All I will say is this, most of what is out there that is pro-abortion is lies. Listen to this OBGYN tell you about that and why he stopped doing abortions.
None of what is in the video is graphic it is just 2 guys talking but if you have any love of children this will tug at your heart strings.
I find it poignant to show you the banner YouTube puts up on this and how that too is lies.
Abortion does not “end a pregnancy” it exterminates a life. It removes a human being from this planet. Does it use medicine and surgery to do this? If you consider the end of “Brave Heart” a surgery than sure.
Ohio just put abortion “rights” in their state constitution. It was never my issue because women seem to be very into it and I know people who wanted kids so bad and couldn’t have them, that it made little sense to me. I’ve met more than one who cried and regretted the abortion decision. Only once did I meet a girl who seemed to almost brag about having them. The worst thing about it is she was very attractive, so it makes me think there was something mentally wrong with her.
Even though it is not my issue, sometimes, I will see memes or art and, for some reason, it affects me on a sentimental level. I always thought there was something kind of majestic about a mother and child.
“Even though it is not my issue”
The value of life IS EVERYONE’S ISSUE. To think what you do is to have fallen prey to the propaganda you typically are rightfully pointing out. This is the same moral relativism that is destroying the west. People are either of value or they are not. There is simply no in-between. If the value of a life simply becomes an equation that weighs the wants of a person or their level of inconvenience to someone else then there is no value on life. And this is what a “mother” is doing in the case of abortion. It is one person deciding that someone else has no value and needs to die. This is what eugenicists do. And this is why all that started with Margaret Sanger. She also played a significant role in the birth control pill.
If you are still thinking it’s not my problem then you need to think about how believing life’s value is relative leads to murder and mass murder. And if you think those are not related then I urge you to do some research and introspection.
@Legatus_Legionis
“And the fallacy of “my body my choice” ignores the life and body of the infant in the womb. What of their bodily autonomy! What of their choice!”/clap… absolutely… Like almost everything that comes from the radical left (and the establishment) that thought is based on nonsense and paraded around as truth. It is the hidden poison pill they always offer.
.
They point at a Twinkie and tell you those are good and delicious and everyone has a right to have a Twinkie. But you don’t know that their is a poison pill in the Twinkie (well frankly it’s made from poison but I digress) and when folks start dying from the Twinkies the left will tell you it’s because some people don’t have enough Twinkies and their is Twinkies inequality and that is why so we need for people to have more of them and they should be free. And people agree and they demand Twinkies and they say Twinkies are a human right. And as people drop dead left and right from the poison all the news outlets and all the lines of info in the mainstream keep telling people Twinkies are awesome and you have a right to have them and you should have more of them. And even though there are dead people everywhere with Twinkies in their hands the news tells you, anyone who thinks that Twinkies are bad is a Twink-a-phobe and the idea they contain poison is a conspiracy theory created out of hatred for Twinkies. And that it is the people who claim Twinkies are bad are the reason why people are dying all over. And those Twink-a-phobes are subhuman because they deny others Twinkies rights and the Twink-a-phobes deserve what ill thing might happen to them. And this is where we are now. Where the thing killing society is lauded as the thing that will save it and anyone whom points that out is the cause of the death of society and we spiral into oblivion.
The people I admire the most are definitely moral people. They take their lives more seriously. The thing is, I kind of had that whole Biblical worldview and did not realize that so many do not. So, the problem with that is, we may run into to people who honestly don’t know right from wrong even. Even if they do, they can still slip. Regarding the Eugenics thing, it seems like Eugenics gets a stigma and all this fear, but dysgenics does not. I didn’t even know there was such a term as dysgenics, but have seen arguments now that it is what is being subsidized.
Let’s say that someone does not care about abortion, I guess what does bothers me is I heard that it does not end there. They like do things with the remains? Like with cells and organs and stuff? Now, that goes deeper and you realize that horror just isn’t a genre of movie.
“we may run into to people who honestly don’t know right from wrong even”
I don’t think that is so much the problem vs. people being told and or taught that doing wrong is not wrong. We see this constantly now in modern culture. They call it destigmatizing but it’s really just normalizing. We no longer call it prostitution, we call it sex work. And people are no longer prostitutes they are sex workers. Making wrong right is about the worst thing you can do to a society. Without a cohesive moral fabric that people agree on, you essentially do not have a society.
“Regarding the Eugenics thing, it seems like Eugenics gets a stigma and all this fear, but dysgenics does not.”
I had not heard that word before. So I did some research and I believe you are using it incorrectly. In it’s origin it was defined as the process of the human gene pool becoming weaker with more often having negative traits because society has functionally removed natural selection. You are referring to the designer human or gene editing situation. Eugenics is removing people or traits from the pool to either somehow help society with less people or to bring forward only the best traits. In the case of Margaret Sanger it was her goal to have less people in poverty. Not by helping people, or educating them or anything altruistic but by their just being less of them through abortion and birth control.
“Much respect and admiration to those who through all the fear and uncertainty choose to bring their children into this world and then sacrifice their wants and needs to nurture and care for them.
May God bless you and your families.”
Amen
Very cool. I never used to watch dramas and documentaries, but now, I am finding them more interesting and the alternative to the corporate woke stuff.
After Sound of Freedom, I watched a bunch of interviews with the producer, Eduardo. Found out later that he prays the Rosary every single day on cam. He also has a moment of silence every single day on cam. Each one is close to an hour. This is in addition to his busy entertainer schedule, so I find the commitment impressive.
Believe it or not, the person who kinds of reminds me of him, in a way, is Melonie Mac with her Bible reading channel. I find people who have that daily discipline kind of deep and interesting.
Anyway, point is, Eduardo, the producer of Sound of Freedom, in one interview he mentioned a pro life film he made called Bella and here it is. So much heart is some working class men out there to adopt.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
